For a number of months, consultants have highlighted the true trigger behind the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically the incorrect use of PCR tests set at a ridiculously excessive cycle rely (CT), which falsely labels wholesome individuals as “COVID-19 instances.” In actuality, the PCR take a look at just isn’t a correct diagnostic take a look at, though it has been promoted as such.
An essential query that calls for a solution is whether or not the consultants at our federal well being businesses and the World Well being Group have been actually too ignorant to perceive the implications of utilizing this take a look at at extreme CT, or whether or not it was completed on goal to create the phantasm of a harmful, out-of-control pandemic.
Regardless, these in cost should be held accountable, which is exactly what the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,1 or ACU),2,3 intends to do.
They’re within the technique of launching a global class-action lawsuit towards these accountable for utilizing fraudulent testing to engineer the looks of a harmful pandemic so as to implement economically devastating lockdowns all over the world. I wrote about this in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation.”
FDA Calls for Increased False Positives
An attention-grabbing case detailed in a January 21, 2021, Buzzfeed article4 that raises those self same questions in regard to the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration is its latest spat with Healing, a California testing firm that acquired its begin in January 2020. It has since risen to develop into one of many largest COVID-19 take a look at suppliers within the U.S.
Healing’s most standard PCR take a look at differs from different suppliers in that it makes use of spit swabbed from the affected person’s tongue, cheek and mouth relatively than from the again of the nasal cavity.
In April 2020, the FDA issued an accelerated emergency use authorization5 for the Healing spit take a look at, however just for sufferers who had been symptomatic throughout the two weeks previous to taking the take a look at, as the information obtainable at that time confirmed it did not catch asymptomatic “instances.”
Nevertheless, the take a look at was subsequently used off-label on people with out signs anyway, and the corporate has been urging the FDA to increase its authorization to incorporate asymptomatic people primarily based on newer knowledge.
In December 2020, Healing submitted that knowledge,6 exhibiting its oral spit take a look at precisely recognized about 90% of optimistic instances when put next towards a nasopharyngeal PCR take a look at set to 35 CT.7
The FDA objected, saying that Healing was evaluating its take a look at towards a PCR that had a CT that was too low, and would due to this fact produce too many false negatives.8 In response to the FDA, the bar Healing had chosen was “not applicable and arbitrary,” Buzzfeed reviews.9
It is a curious assertion coming from the FDA, contemplating the scientific consensus on PCR assessments is that something over 35 CTs is scientifically unjustifiable.10,11,12
From the beginning, the FDA and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention really helpful working PCR assessments at a CT of 40.13 This was already excessive sufficient to provide an inordinate variety of false positives, thereby labeling wholesome individuals as “COVID-19 instances,” however when it comes to Healing’s spit take a look at, the FDA is demanding they evaluate it towards PCR processed at a CT of 45, which is much more more likely to produce false positives.
The FDA’s concern is that Healing’s take a look at is lacking infections and giving infectious individuals a clear invoice of well being. Nevertheless, in actuality, it’s much more probably that the take a look at is precisely removing individuals who certainly should not infectious in any respect and rightly needs to be given a clear invoice of well being. It appears the FDA is merely pushing for a course of that can guarantee a better “caseload” to maintain the phantasm of widespread an infection going.
When Are You Really Infectious?
A persistent sticking level with the PCR take a look at is that it picks up lifeless viral particles, and by excessively magnifying these particles with CTs within the 40s, noninfectious people are labeled as infectious and informed to self-isolate. Briefly, media and public well being officers have conflated “instances” — optimistic assessments — with the precise sickness.
Medically talking, a “case” refers to a sick particular person. It by no means ever referred to somebody who had no signs of sickness. Now rapidly, this well-established medical time period, “case,” has been arbitrarily redefined to imply somebody who examined optimistic for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA.
The analysis is unequivocal with regards to who’s infectious and who’s not. You can’t infect one other particular person except you carry stay virus, and also you usually is not going to develop signs except your viral load is excessive sufficient.
Because it pertains to PCR testing, when excessively excessive CTs are used, even a minute viral load that’s too low to trigger signs can register as optimistic. And, because the take a look at can’t distinguish between stay virus and lifeless viral particles, chances are you’ll not even be carrying stay virus in any respect.
These vital drawbacks are why PCR testing actually solely needs to be completed on symptomatic sufferers, and why a optimistic take a look at needs to be weighed as only one issue of analysis. Signs should even be taken under consideration. In case you have no signs, your probabilities of being infectious and spreading the an infection to others is mainly nil, as knowledge14 from 9,899,828 people have proven.
Of those, not a single particular person who had been in shut contact with an asymptomatic particular person ended up testing optimistic. This research even confirmed that even in instances the place asymptomatic people had had an energetic an infection, and had been carriers of stay virus, the viral load had been too low for transmission. As famous by the authors:15
“In contrast with symptomatic sufferers, asymptomatic contaminated individuals typically have low amount of viral masses and a quick period of viral shedding, which lower the transmission danger of SARS-CoV-2.
Within the current research, virus tradition was carried out on samples from asymptomatic optimistic instances, and located no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus. All shut contacts of the asymptomatic optimistic instances examined adverse, indicating that the asymptomatic optimistic instances detected on this research have been unlikely to be infectious.”
PCR Picks Up Useless Virus for Weeks After An infection Has Cleared
As a result of the PCR take a look at can’t discern between stay virus and lifeless, noninfectious viral particles, the timing of the take a look at finally ends up being essential. One instance of this was introduced in a letter to the editor of The New England Journal of Drugs,16 through which the creator describes an investigation completed on hospitalized COVID-19 sufferers in Seoul, South Korea.
Whereas the median time from symptom onset to viral clearance confirmed by cultured samples was simply seven days, with the longest timeframe being 12 days, the PCR take a look at continued to choose up SARS-CoV-2 for a median of 34 days. The shortest time between symptom onset to a adverse PCR take a look at was 24 days.
In different phrases, there was no detectable stay virus in sufferers after about seven days from onset of signs (at most 12 days). The PCR take a look at, nonetheless, continued to register them as “optimistic” for SARS-CoV-2 for about 34 days. The rationale this issues is as a result of you probably have no stay virus in your physique, you aren’t infectious and pose no danger to others.
This then means that testing sufferers past, say, Day 12 to be protected, after symptom onset is pointless, as any optimistic result’s more likely to be false. However there’s extra. As famous in that New England Journal of Drugs article:17
“Viable virus was recognized till 3 days after the decision in fever … Viral tradition was optimistic solely in samples with a cycle-threshold worth of 28.4 or much less. The incidence of tradition positivity decreased with an growing time from symptom onset and with an growing cycle-threshold worth.”
This implies symptomology is a extremely essential piece of the puzzle. If no viable virus is detectable past Day 3 after your fever ends, it’s in all probability pointless to retest past that time. A optimistic outcome past Day 3 after your fever breaks is, once more, more likely to be a false optimistic, as you must have stay virus so as to be infectious.
Much more essential, these outcomes reconfirm that CTs above 30 are inadvisable as they’re extremely more likely to be improper. Right here, they discovered the CT needed to be under 28.4 to ensure that the optimistic take a look at to correspond with stay virus. As famous by the authors:18
“Our findings could also be helpful in guiding isolation durations for sufferers with Covid-19 and in estimating the danger of secondary transmission amongst shut contacts in contract tracing.”
Testing for Useless Viruses Will Guarantee Eternal Lockdowns
To circle again to the Healing PCR take a look at, the corporate argues that the take a look at is correct with regards to detecting energetic an infection, and as CEO Fred Turner informed Buzzfeed:19
“When you’re screening for a return to work and also you’re choosing up everybody who had COVID two months in the past, nobody’s going to return to work. If you wish to detect energetic COVID, what the ‘early’ research exhibits is that Healing is extremely efficient at doing that.”
Once more, this has to do with the truth that the Healing spit take a look at has a sensitivity resembling that of a nasopharyngeal PCR set at a CT of 30. The decrease CT rely narrows the pool of optimistic outcomes to incorporate primarily these with larger viral masses and those that usually tend to really carry stay virus. It is a good factor. What the FDA desires Healing to do is to widen that internet in order that extra noninfectious people may be labeled as a “case.”
In an e mail to Buzzfeed, Dr. Michael Mina, an epidemiologist at Harvard T.H. Chan College of Public Well being, acknowledged that utilizing a CT of 45 is “completely insane,” as a result of at that magnification, chances are you’ll be taking a look at a single RNA molecule, whereas “when persons are sick and are contagious, they actually can have 1,000,000,000,000x that quantity.”20
Mina added that such a delicate PCR take a look at “would doubtlessly detect somebody 35 days post-infection who’s totally recovered and trigger that particular person to should enter isolation. That’s loopy and it’s not science-based, it’s not medicine-based and it’s not public health-oriented.”21
Whereas the FDA has issued a warning to not use the Healing spit take a look at on asymptomatic individuals, Florida has dismissed the warning and can proceed to make use of the take a look at on symptomatic and asymptomatic people alike. Solely Miami-Dade County is reconsidering how it’s utilizing the take a look at, though a definitive choice has but to be introduced.22
The Decrease the CT, the Higher the Accuracy
Whereas the FDA claims excessive sensitivity (that means larger CT) is required to make sure we don’t find yourself with asymptomatic spreaders in our communities, as reviewed above, this danger is exceedingly small. We actually have to cease panicking about the opportunity of wholesome individuals killing others. It’s not a sane development, as detailed in “The World Is Suffering from Mass Delusional Psychosis.”
In response to an April 2020 research23 within the European Journal of Scientific Microbiology & Infectious Ailments, to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR take a look at have to be run at simply 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy charge is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your probability of a optimistic PCR take a look at being a true optimistic shrinks to zero.
Equally, a December 3, 2020, systematic evaluate24 revealed within the journal of Scientific Infectious Ailments, which assessed the findings of 29 completely different research, discovered that “CT values have been considerably decrease … in specimens producing stay virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the possibility of a optimistic take a look at really being because of the presence of stay (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the chances of stay virus tradition lowered by roughly 33% for each one unit improve in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included have been unable to establish any stay viruses in instances the place a optimistic PCR take a look at had used a CT above 24.
In instances the place a CT above 35 was used, the affected person needed to be symptomatic so as to acquire a stay virus tradition. This once more confirms that PCR with a CT over 35 actually shouldn’t be used on asymptomatic individuals, as any optimistic result’s more likely to be meaningless and easily power them into isolation for no purpose.
PCR Testing Based mostly on Inaccurate Paper
In closing, the entire premise of PCR testing to diagnose COVID-19 is in severe query, because the apply seems to be primarily based on an misguided paper that didn’t even bear peer-review earlier than being applied worldwide.
November 30, 2020, a staff of twenty-two worldwide scientists revealed a evaluate25 difficult the scientific paper26 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman (the so-called “Corman-Drosten paper”).
In response to Reiner Fuellmich,27 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee talked about in the beginning of this text, Drosten is a key perpetrator within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted because of “deadly errors,”28 certainly one of which is the truth that it was written, and the take a look at itself developed, earlier than any viral isolate was obtainable. The take a look at is just primarily based on a partial genetic sequence revealed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who’re now demanding the paper’s retraction, acknowledged:29
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that take a look at has been completely destroyed by this paper … When Drosten developed the take a look at, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the take a look at from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate.
That they had a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology … the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up. They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks …
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten take a look at paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they have been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification didn’t correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There may be nothing on the heart of it. It’s all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there are not any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they stated: ‘Right here’s the viral isolate.’ Have you learnt what they did? They swabbed one particular person. One particular person, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One particular person. They usually assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it’s all filled with holes, the entire thing.”
The critique towards PCR testing is additional strengthened by the November 20, 2020, research30 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in any PCR-positive instances. I referenced this research earlier, noting that not a single one that had been in shut contact with an asymptomatic particular person ended up testing optimistic.
However that’s not all. After evaluating PCR testing knowledge from 9,899,828 individuals, and conducting extra stay cultures to examine for energetic infections in those that examined optimistic, utilizing a CT of 37 or decrease, they have been unable to detect stay virus in any of them, which is a relatively astonishing discovering.
On the entire, it appears clear that mass testing utilizing PCR is inappropriate, and does little or no if something to maintain the inhabitants protected. Its major result’s merely the perpetuation of the false concept that wholesome, noninfectious individuals can pose a mortal risk to others, and that we should keep away from social interactions. It’s a delusional thought that’s wreaking havoc on the worldwide psyche, and it’s time to place an finish to this unhealthy, unscientific lifestyle.